Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 'Satanic' art publication causes uproar in Belfast  (Read 3085 times)
Suzanne
Site Admin
Glorious Nosebleed
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 5.098



WWW
« on: Jul 08, 2004, 17:28 »



Censorship has always been a contentious topic here, particularly where religion and money are concerned. The alleged publication of 'devil worshipping' articles in the current issue of the arty-and-alternative magazine The Vacuum has caused a stir within Belfast City Council. The magazine features an interview with an exorcist and an article called I peed in church, and has been deemed blasphemous by certain city councillors. The fact that The Vacuum was granted £5,000 of Belfast Clinical Arts Committee funding has no doubt added more fuel to the controversial 'hell' fire. Eric Smyth of the DUP could not conceal his disgust:

Quote
The Arts Committee should have examined exactly who it was giving money to - it has let the public down. In light of this, I would call on the council to completely re-examine its arts funding policy.


While Smyth was supported by, among others, Ulster Unionist Jim Rodgers, his opinion on the matter did not go undisputed. Sinn Féin councillor and chair of the Council's arts sub-committee, Eoin O'Broin, cautioned against censorship of any kind within the arts:

Quote
Although the magazine is not to everyone's taste, the Council has no right to interfere with the end products of arts organisations we fund.


He also warned of the possibility of legal action on the part of the magazine if funding is indeed withdrawn.

The Vacuum has seen itself forced to issue a response to the on-going debate; it replied to a front-page report in Friday's Belfast News Letter as follows (excerpt):

Quote
The Vacuum does not promote Devil Worshipping. We are mystified as to why you report the 'discussion of exorcism' and the description of 'devil proverbs' as if these were in themselves wrong...The Vacuum in fact contains informed debate by well-qualified academics and journalists.


The Arts Council of Northern Ireland, which also gives funds to The Vacuum, has released a statement advocating 'artistic freedom of expression'. However, the Belfast Council Arts Committee has arranged to meet in August to further discuss the £5,000 grant that the magazine received.

The Vacuum is the spawn of Factotum.

 Arrow The Vacuum
 Arrow Factotum

(via CIRCA Art Magazine)
Logged

heretic
Hapless Child
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 72


« Reply #1 on: Jul 08, 2004, 17:52 »

Its a shame that christianity have behold so much influence in our world, altough its zealous madness, ruthless struggles for power and and their subtile ways to unliberate us all, threatens the personal freedom from all of us.

For that reason, I believe that its always better to be an atheistic freemind than a fanatic worshipper of an idea of mind that teaches his followers to shut up and stop thinkin for their own.
Logged
Creed
Doubtful Guest
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


« Reply #2 on: Aug 06, 2005, 21:42 »

Why is there evil and suffering in the world?
 

     The curious as well as the critics of Christianity ask this question. If God is all-powerful and all loving, then why does He permit evil and suffering in the world? Various answers have been given but permanently settling the issue is impossible because so many of our answers raise further questions. Nevertheless, our lack of ability to answer the question perfectly does not mean that we cannot offer solutions. Of course, I do not assume to be able to answer these questions definitively, but I can offer some solutions.
     First of all, it is possible that God has reasons for allowing evil to exist that we simply cannot understand. In this the Christian can have confidence in God knowing that His ways are above our ways (Isaiah 55:8-9). As the Bible says, the just shall live by faith (Hab. 2:4).
     Second, God may be letting evil run its course in order to prove that evil is evil and that suffering, which is the unfortunate product of evil, is further proof that anything contrary to God’s will is bad, harmful, painful, and leads to death.
     God gave Adam dominion over the world (Gen. 1:28). When he rebelled against God, he set in motion an entire series of events and changed the very nature of man and creation. Both were affected by sin. Creation was no longer a paradise, but bore thorns and thistles (Gen. 3:17-18; Rom. 8:22). People became sinful (Rom. 5:12; Eph. 2:3), who were haters of God (Rom. 3:19-12), etc. The only conclusion to such a situation is death. Jesus said, "And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect’s sake those days shall be shortened" (Matt. 24:22).
     Sin is rebellion against God and His created order. But God has not left us alone in this fallen world. He continued to enter this world, pointing us to Himself, to truth, to morality, purity, and love. He used the evil of the world (liars, perjurers, the envious, etc), to bring His Son to the cross so that we might have the opportunity of eternal life. In this, God has not stepped away from fallen creation, but has stepped into it by becoming Jesus. God works within the fallen world to affect change and He uses fallen people to accomplish His will. In this, He is proving His sovereignty over evil, suffering, and rebellious people, proving that sin and evil are utterly futile, and that He is worthy of honor and glory.
     A third possible reason that God is letting evil occur is so that on the day of judgment, the condemned will have no right to say that their sentence is unjust. God is not stopping people from exercising their free will. Think about this: If someone said that God should stop evil and suffering, then should God then stop all evil and suffering? If God only stopped some of it, then we would still be asking the same question of why it exists. So, if we want God to stop evil and suffering, then He must stop all of it. We have no problem with this when it means stopping a catastrophe, or a murder, or a rape. But what about when someone thinks of something evil? Evil is evil whether it is acted out or not. Hatred and bigotry in someone’s heart is wrong. If it is wrong, and if God is to stop all evil, then He must stop that person from thinking his own thoughts. To do that, God must remove his freedom of thought. Furthermore, which person on the earth has not thought something evil? God would be required, then, to stop all people from exercising their free will. This is something God has chosen not to do. Therefore, we could say that one of the reasons that God permits evil and suffering is because of man’s free will.
     Fourth, it is quite possible that God uses the suffering to do good. In other words, He produces patience through tribulation (Rom. 5:3). Or He may desire to save someone through it. Take for example, the account of Joseph who was sold into slavery by His brothers. What they did was wrong and Joseph suffered greatly for it. But, later, God raised up Joseph in Egypt to make provisions for the people of that land during the coming drought of seven years. But not only was Egypt saved, but also so was his family and brothers who originally sold him into slavery. Joseph finally says to them, "You meant it for evil, but God meant it for good" (Gen. 50:15-21). Of course, the greatest example of God using evil for good is the death of Christ. Evil people brought him to the cross, but God used that cross as the means to save the world.
     But then we must ask, if this is true, are we working against God by working against evil and suffering? No, we are not. God says he does not want us to sin and suffer. But it is simply true that God can use evil despite of its apparent despicable nature.
     God is in the world using the world and its failures for His glory and the benefit of those who listen to Him.
     But then, what about those who seem to innocently suffer with no benefit resulting? What about the woman who is raped, or the innocent by stander who is killed by a stray bullet. In both cases, the victims and families suffer nothing but pain and loss. What good can this possibly be?
     I think that the answer is two-fold. One, ultimately, no one is innocent. All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God (Rom. 3:23) and are by nature children of wrath (Eph. 2:3). There is none innocent. Though this is biblically accurate, it does not satisfy the question emotionally. Why do little babies suffer for things they have not done? I must acknowledge that I do not know. Ultimately, we must trust God who knows the beginning from the end and sees the grand picture. He will have the final word and He will be vindicated.

     Conclusion

     Suffering is the result of human sin. The world is not the way that God created it and because of that, all are vulnerable to the affects of sin in the world. Why does one person suffer and another does not? Why do catastrophes happen to some and no others? It is because sin is in the world. But there will come a day when the Lord will return and cleanse this world of all sin and all suffering.

"And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away" (Rev. 21:4).
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: